Sylvia Plath: The Imperfect Perfectionist

Sylvia Plaths verse line is an manner of a face-to-face and despairing grief. She had the gift of recreating her have former(prenominal) experiences in a complex form, so as to remove them from her present, that it started to calculate compar adequate an obsession. Within this obsession her poems repoint a regular cast of self-centeredness. It was this characteristic that lead her far from any self-disco genuinely and self-definition, and drove her to her death, an art as she words it. Plath readily exploits her emotions through with(predicate) the personified language to soma a shameful and super-natural atmosphere, in attempt of creating a valiantly unremitting campaign against the obscure hole of depression and suicide. However, her attempts went to waste when she committed suicide in the February of 1963.Plaths poetry en commensurates the reader to unravel and look orphic into her victimised spirit. It was for this talent that she had received such(prenominal) pra ise, exclusively much more criticism. Plaths poetry mirrors the life-time of Plath, and to urinate sense of her poetry it is important to try and permit an arrangement of Plath, to visualise things through her perspective. This is what most critics lack, and so I have interpreted a step to try and beneathstand her. It is for this reason I leave alone take into consideration the perspective of psychoanalysts to aid me in my understanding of her, in particular the theories of Sigmund Freud, and the view of Marxists, to give me varied opinions. in that location be many an(prenominal) an(prenominal) themes common in her poems, each of which have equal importance, but I have chosen to analyse the themes of colour, family and likenessships, and the self-inflicted pains she puts upon herself.Relationships were al courses a decrepit point in Plaths life. She has always felt disappointed by the relationships she had with others, curiously that between her give, contract an d husband. Her poems, which are partly stimulated by them, curiously Daddy, Medusa and Tulips, are a powerful source of murderous art, where she was eachowed to expose her bitterness towards them. She uses reoccurring imagination associated with the three protagonists in her life, and poetry in attempt of breaking free from the chains of a hag-ridden mind of the heroine.The relationship between Plath and her get under ones skin was real ineffectual, or that is how she exemplifies it through the use of her poetry. Medusa, which is said to be found on her mother is like a fantasy tale gone wrong. Plath creates a terrific fictional jellyfish like character personified by the character of her mother. There is non heretofore a unretentive neck beingness convey in this poem, unlike Daddy.Who do you hazard you are?A sacramental manduction wafer? Blubbery Mary?This is a hate poem, as the lines show no affection expressing hatred to such a level that the language use is so damp and rude that it is hard to distinguish any relation between them. They overly trifle proof of the suppressed anger, which has brought Plath d deliver in her life. The poem is made of many flashbulb memories, which are created at a time of high emotion. Memories of this large-hearted are thought to be precise accurate and so we can non ch allenge Plaths recollection of these events to prove that they are false, however, passim her poems, Plath shows a habit of inflicting pain upon herself in exaggeration of the cause and affect. She uses the homogeneous technique of reminiscing about the past, whilst exploiting the pain and suffering she underwent in Daddy. other(prenominal) psychodynamic approach originates from explanations of attachment. Freud put forward an account, known as cupboard love, based on the nippers attachment with its mother. He states that the reason the child is attached with its mother is because they know that their mother will provide them with thei r needs without delay. These high expectations from a mother whitethorn also be the reason for Plaths anger towards her mother. Plath may have bear downd her mother for the death of her take, and built hatred for her for the incident that she was unable to bring her, her dad back. Stan Smith, a Marxist has similar views. He believes a writer is a cock of circumstance, and Plath was a creature of emotional torment. Her fathers death drove her to insanity, reservation her more and more preoccupy with her fathers death.Plath always recalled her dad through the imagination of the tail end. She felt that the foot was to be blamed for the death of her father and use it as an excuse to build revulsion against him.In which I have lived like a footThe boot in the faceDaddy is a good interpreter of her disillusions about her father. These quotes taken from Daddy show her misrepresentations of her father as a brutal and obsessive man, however it is learnt from many sources that his ch aracter was often describe as authoritarian and maintained a relationship with his children with actually little involvement, and so her distraught behaviour can be excused when she conveys her grand abhorrence. The line If Ive killed one man, Ive killed two shows that she has destroyed the image of her father, and the world power to call for good in anyone. numerous Marxists believe this is entirely unfair and that she cannot blame the mistakes of one person to generalise everyone else. This is how she creates a negative image of everyone almost her, including her family, by reflecting her sweeping statement upon the world.The way in which she conveys a very pessimistic illustration of her father repeatedly shows that she is fixated on the torture she rings her father has inflicted upon her. This defence mechanism she uses in Daddy and Medusa is explained in the constitution theory, which states that any experiences through childhood, which are of excessive, pain or pleasur e force fixated in the mind. Later on in life it leads to repression (when the mind tries to blank out out any of those threatening thoughts). I also consent with this psychological explanation, however, some of this diagnosis does not examinem to be the aspect for Plath. shortlyer of eradicating these thoughts from her mind, she keeps reminding herself of them. Plaths imagery is so constant passim her poems that it seems she is trying to remove these thoughts and incidents from her mind and life by writing them down, but is unable to, which explains the repetition in her poems. Unlike psychoanalysts, many Marxists have a very different view, that we cannot account on Plaths recital of her parents, as Stan Smith words it, a increase of her own time and place. I in any case agree with their opinion. In her poems, Sylvia deeply focuses on their faults but does not pay any worry to her own. A popular Marxist theory is that Plath and her problems with her parents is part of a much bigger problem. Compared with other issues her strike is insignificant, and so for her to exaggerate these issues is unfair.Daddy is somewhat Plaths finale, to spurn her dad from her mind and life. It seems to me that whilst recollecting memories of her father, Plath was unable to recall enough and was forced to epicurean from the small amount she has. Gradually the recollections became very heavily buried under the elaborations, and the poem becomes a stranger to her, or so that is how it seems to the reader. However, for Plath, the more mantled her poetry, the more iconl her poems become. And this is why it is necessary to try and understand her, so you can dig beneath the top layer to reveal her within. She very cleverly hides her affection for her father in the same way. It is crucial to see beneath the cruel and callous layer to see that under all of this so-called hate for her dad, Plath still has some love for him, yet all this suppressed anger and, torture, crea ted by the imagery, can be justified.To be able to give an explanation for anger, whilst investigating her real feeling towards her father, it is necessary to figure the imagery she uses.Any more, somber shoe. In which I have lived like a footThe foot and shoe metaphors have a luck of importance in Plaths work, as she is able to relate to them very substantially to help her present her feelings. As this quote shows, the boot is a token of her, suffocated and stuck, and also of the fear of which she had to live with whilst her father was alive. His dominant status in the house oppressed Plath, and even whilst he was alive he wasnt able to give her the love that a young child needed. They also represent the initial discovery of the diabetes, that later killed him, because he was reluctant to have his stick amputated. By use these images Al Alvarez believes that in Daddy she goes mighty down to the deep spring of her sickness and describes it purely. I find this quite nonsensi cal that Alvarez has judged Plaths work as an account of her sickness, rather than an exclamation from a child who has been take of fatherly love and affection. It doesnt seem as if he has taken into consideration her emotions, and has made no attempt to try and understand her perspective. Daddy is a cry of pain from a daughter who expresses incredulous psychological detriment because a father will not return unconditional love by surviving for her pursuit. Plath too, like any other individual should have the right to express this trauma, which is what most critics like Alvarez are forgetting and not allowing her to do. Many analysts also compare Plaths behaviour to the Electra complex. I disagree with this theory and dont think that Plaths feelings for her father should not be interpreted in a intimate form.Despite these in depth analyses, could it not be that Plath only uses the black shoe imagery as an extension of the final solution imagery, or even only as a link associated to her father? Liz Hood, a Marxist, believes that this over-depth analyze of the black shoe may infact be an example of adding ones own interpretation to something which may in essence be a great admit more simple. I think this opinion should be taken very seriously when trying to investigate Plath relationships and life. The black shoe could just now represent the initial discovery of her fathers diabetes, but is very misleading to many. It is these factors, which make the understanding of Plath nearly impossible.Despite the hate being shown, I agree with Alvarez, concluding that Daddy is a love poem. The brutality of the poem makes the idea of Daddy being a love poem very obvious, but yet not so obvious. Examples of the double innuendo are shown in many places throughout the poem, but are intertwined in all the vicious imagery.I used to pray to recover you. Ach duor Achooyour gobbledygooPlath refers to her father as du. Although by using du Plath dissociates her relationship, i nstead by using Daddy, there is still some kind of cooing tenderness in thus which complicates the other more savage cross out of resentment, thinks Alvarez and myself. This is because Plath is torn between viewing her father in the look of a child and in the eyes of an adult, as you can see from the quotes above. Certain words are very childish, and make reference to Plath as a child. She is still a daughter who never grew out of the defend that all daughters go through, thinking theyre fathers are the closest thing to graven image, that she is still daddys little princess, and so by using these words and by referring to her father as daddy she is compensating for the loss of her childhood without her father.Opposing these thoughts is Hugh Kenner, another psychoanalyst, who believes theres a lot of nonsense being talked about in these poems. Nevertheless, he also thinks she deserves to be accredited for her creativity. Kenner has separated her creativity and emotions into two c ategories, where as I think this is impossible to do. Her poetry and the sensation of the poetry are portray through her creativity, which are her emotions. Daddy and Medusa both show the complementing balance between the two. The way in which she contrasts her self made anguish with what may be seen as much more sever suffering, so simply is proof of her ability to express her own pain through literature whilst weaving in her personal grievance. This ability helps Plath to dissolve herself into her work to such an extent that she progressively exposes her feelings with more and more depth, and gradually self-destructs in Daddy. The most common imagery that she used to do this is associated with the Holocaust and religion.Psychoanalyst Alvarez suggests that by using the Holocaust imagery, what she does in the poem is, with a weird detachment, to turn the violence against herself so as to show that she can equal her oppressors with her self-inflicted oppression. This is definitely the case in Daddy. Throughout Daddy, Plath compares the many conflicts in her life with images of World warfare 2. She creates suffering all around her, and when suffering is there whatever you do, by inflicting upon yourself you achieve your identity, you set yourself free. This is created by the use of the Holocaust imagery. Plath causes her own aggression by contrasting everything involved in her poem with this imagery. In her mind, there is enough comparison for her to be able to convince herself that she is a Jew, and by doing this has the ability to bombard every pain, in every sense, not only that of the Holocaust, upon herself, which takes her self-inflicted suffering to the highest level. The black shoe can also be interpreted as an extension of the Holocaust and Nazi imagery and by doing this Plath also gives an impression of her father as a Nazi.I think it is unfair of Plath to and compare her anger and suffering with that of the Holocaust, however, Plaths poetry is very apparitional and whilst criticising her work we need to take in mind that this is the mind of the hurt heroine. Sharing the same view is Leon Wieselter, a Marxist, who too thinks, Whatever her father did to her, it could not have been what the Germans did to the Jews he goes on to say, The metaphor is inappropriate. I do not agree with this opinion of his. We as readers, and outsiders will be unable to experience Plaths emotions, and so do not have the right to criticise her emotions which are portrayed through her imagery. What we may see as bearable anguish, may be comparable to murder for Plath (in the case of being separated from her father), and we have established from previous analysis and just by reading her poetry that her fathers death seriously scarred Plath mentally. Furthermore I think that Plath feels some attachment to the Jews, because of her original nationality. Challenging this opinion is Stan Smith, another Marxist, who feels it would be wrong to see Plaths use of the imagery in the intentness camp simply as unacceptable.Another very blunt try at this technique is shown throughout peeress Lazarus. In maam Lazarus thecultural resonance of the original story is harnessed to a vehemently self- justifying purpose, so that the supra-personal dimensions of knowledge-to which myth typically gives access-are slighted in favour of the intense personal need of the poet, as Hugh Kenner describes this. This is a very accurate account of Plath in Lady Lazarus. Here she causes to experience this torture in a very direct way. We can see this from the first stanza.I have through it again. One year in every ten I distribute it-These powerful lines show that Plaths self-made agonies are her drugs. She is self generating and to get button to write she imposes pain upon herself. By doing this she also manages to gain everyones attention of which she feels she was deprived from when she was younger, or maybe even all her life.Again in Lady Lazarus she in volves some holocaust imagery and some reference to her fathers foot. However there is not much imagery of this sort in Lady Lazarus but the language used is more frank, and revolved around her as a person. In a sense its is a summary of her life, a apprize autobiography. By repeating the upsetting events in her life she reminds herself of them, and in a way by doing this she is causing herself to drown again in her own history.Another kind of imagery, which I think scares Plath is that of colour. It seems like Plath had a phobic neurosis of the colour red. Although this is a different imagery in its own respect, I think that Plath looks too deep into the various connotations of the colour red. Red associates itself with many assorted connotations, including love and passion, hatred and anger, jealousy, roses and blood. These are just a a few(prenominal) of the many. When scanning through these words, you are able to connect them with the various events and emotions in Plaths lif e. This is why she tries to avoid red in her poems, in my opinion. However, there are exceptions. Plath feels she is able to use red as another sort of imagery to put across her feelings.This line taken from Tulip is an example of the exceptions she makes.The tulips are too redtheir redness talks to my woundsupsetting me with their sudden tongues and their colour, a cardinal red lead sinkers round my neckthe vivid tulips eat my oxygen.These quotes show us to what extent the colour red causes her harm. In Tulips Plath personifies the tulips, by making them able to physically hurt her, as shown by the quotes. However, as soon as she brings to light the redness of the tulip, her audience become aware of the negativity of the tulips, and a very tense atmosphere is created. By characterising the tulips she feels like everyone is victimising her, and so again brings a feeling of fear and oppression upon her. She uses red to supplant someone, of whom she is writing about.The tulips are h armless, but the redness attacks her mind.The patient attempts to escape by every possible means. First he says nothing comes into his head, then that so much comes into his head that he cant grasp any of itat function he admits that he really cannot say anything, he is so dishonored toso it goes on, with untold variations.I think this quote said by Freud is perfect to conclude Plath. The paper is Plaths couch, and the pen her doctor.Poetry is mostly created for the sake of releasing pent up emotions, that one finds impossible to keep inside them, similar to crying out, rather than creating poems for the sake of art. However, the main question, which will trouble many minds for generations to come, is, was Sylvias outcry disguised behind a false persona?